Desafiando la división norte-sur en el diseño decolonial
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este artículo hace una crítica a la división norte-sur que predomina en el discurso sobre la descolonización del diseño, reconociendo su importancia histórica y al mismo tiempo exponiendo sus limitaciones a la hora de hacer avanzar las agendas decoloniales. A menudo, la adopción acrítica de esta dicotomía conduce a la simplificación excesiva, la exclusión y el aislamiento, limitando el impacto práctico de los esfuerzos descolonizadores. Basándonos en las conclusiones de un estudio global ―abordado desde la antropología del diseño― sobre el intercambio de energía, abogamos por una perspectiva postdesarrollista que trascienda la división norte-sur. Nuestro estudio presenta tres ideas clave: la colonización está arraigada en una ideología y requiere una reforma global para la descolonización; el aprendizaje mutuo entre el norte y el sur es esencial; y las infraestructuras desempeñan un papel crucial a la hora de concebir e implementar alternativas decoloniales. Este trabajo pretende estimular el debate sobre la necesidad de adoptar un paradigma postdesarrollista para la descolonización del diseño que sea dialógico, contextual, infraestructural y comparativo.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
NOTA DE COPYRIGHT
Todos los contenidos de esta edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo licencia Creative Commons de “Atribución-Copartirigual 4.0 Internacional” (CC-BY-SA). Cualquier reproducción total o parcial del material deberá citar su procedencia.
Los derechos de las imágenes publicadas pertenecen a sus autores, quienes otorgan a Diseña la licencia para su uso. La gestión de los permisos y la autorización de publicación de las imágenes (o de cualquier material) que contenga derechos de autor y sus consecuentes derechos de reproducción en esta publicación es de exclusiva responsabilidad de los autores de los artículos.
Citas
Abdulla, D. (2021). Disciplinary Disobedience: A Border-Thinking Approach to Design. In C. Mareis & N. Paim (Eds.), Design Struggles: Intersecting Histories, Pedagogies, and Perspectives (pp. 227–241). Valiz.
Adams, S., Brown, D., Cárdenas Álvarez, J. P., Chitchyan, R., Fell, M. J., Hahnel, U. J. J., Hojckova, K., Johnson, C., Klein, L., Montakhabi, M., Say, K., Singh, A., & Watson, N. (2021). Social and Economic Value in Emerging Decentralized Energy Business Models: A Critical Review. Energies, 14(23), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237864
Ansari, A. (2019). Decolonizing Design through the Perspectives of Cosmological Others: Arguing for an Ontological Turn in Design Research and Practice. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 26(2), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368048
Ansari, A. (2021). Design’s Missing Others and Their Incommensurate Worlds. In T. Fry & A. Nocek (Eds.), Design in Crisis: New Worlds, Philosophies and Practices (pp. 137–157). Routledge.
Baha, S. E., Dawdy, G., Sturkenboom, N., Price, R., & Snelders, D. (2018). Good Design-Driven Innovation. DRS2018 Research Papers, 1, 98–111. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.648
Bloch, M. (2010). Ideology. In A. Barnard & J. Spencer (Eds.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology (pp. 369–370).
Centeno, M. A., & Cohen, J. N. (2012). The Arc of Neoliberalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150235
Connell, R., & Dados, N. (2014). Where in the World Does Neoliberalism Come From?: The Market Agenda in Southern Perspective. Theory and Society, 43(2), 117–138.
Davis, T. W. D. (2012). Globalisation and the North/South Divide: An Overview. In R. Pettman (Ed.), Handbook on International Political Economy (pp. 231–247). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814366984_0015
Demaria, F., Kothari, A., Salleh, A., Escobar, A., & Acosta, A. (2023). Post-development: From the Critique of Development to a Pluriverse of Alternatives. In S. Villamayor-Tomas & R. Muradian (Eds.), The Barcelona School of Ecological Economics and Political Ecology: A Companion in Honour of Joan Martinez-Alier (pp. 59–69). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22566-6_6
Diethelm, J. (2016). De-colonizing Design Thinking. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 2(2), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2016.08.001
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press.
Escobar, A. (2021). Autonomous Design and the Emergent Transitional Critical Design Studies Field. In C. Mareis & N. Paim (Eds.), Design Struggles: Intersecting Histories, Pedagogies, and Perspectives (pp. 25–38). Valiz.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum.
Fry, T., Dilnot, C., & Stewart, S. (2015). Design and the Question of History. Bloomsbury.
Ganti, T. (2014). Neoliberalism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43, 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155528
Geib, S. (2023). Decolonizing the Design Process: A Case Study in Authorship, Power, and Control. Diid —Disegno Industriale Industrial Design, DSI 1. https://doi.org/10.30682/diiddsi23t5k
Gutiérrez Borrero, A. (2021). When Design Goes South: From Decoloniality, through Declassification to Dessobons. In T. Fry & A. Nocek (Eds.), Design in Crisis: New Worlds, Philosophies and Practices (pp. 56–73). Routledge.
Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
Julier, G. (2013). From Design Culture to Design Activism. Design and Culture, 5(2), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470813X13638640370814
Kaszynska, P. (2023). Value in Design: Neoliberalism versus Pragmatism. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 9(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2023.05.001
Kipnis, A. (2010). Neoliberalism. In A. Barnard & J. Spencer (Eds.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology (pp. 503–504).
Litonjua, M. D. (2012). Third World/Global South: From Modernization, to Dependency/Liberation, to Postdevelopment. Journal of Third World Studies, 29(1), 25–56.
Menakem, R. (2017). My Grandmother’s Hands: Racialized Trauma and the Pathway to Mending Our Hearts and Bodies. Central Recovery Press.
Onafuwa, D. (2018). Allies and Decoloniality: A Review of the Intersectional Perspectives on Design, Politics, and Power Symposium. Design and Culture, 10(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2018.1430995
Otto, T., & Smith, R. C. (2013). Design Anthropology: A Distinct Style of Knowing. In W. Gunn, T. Otto, & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Design Anthropology (pp. 1–29). Bloomsbury.
Papanek, V. J. (1971). Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. Pantheon Books.
Patil, K. (2024). Shape of the Design Worldview: Does Language Inform the Design Sense? Design Issues, 40(3), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00769
Schultz, T., Abdulla, D., Ansari, A., Canlı, E., Keshavarz, M., Kiem, M., Martins, L. P. de O., & J.S. Vieira de Oliveira, P. (2018). What Is at Stake with Decolonizing Design? A Roundtable. Design and Culture, 10(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2018.1434368
Shvartzberg Carrió, M. (2022). Designing Decolonization? Architecture and Indigenous Development. In K. Ruckstuhl, I. A. Velásquez Nimatuj, J.-A. McNeish, & N. Postero (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Indigenous Development (pp. 402–413). Routledge.
Silbey, S. (2006). Ideology. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology (pp. 278–279). Cambridge University Press.
Singh, A. (2019). Conceptualizing Inter-household Energy Exchanges: An Anthropology-through-design Approach [Doctoral Dissertation, Delft University of Technology]. https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:57be7165-2726-4a1a-b076-c5ed3988e00b
Singh, A., Romero Herrera, N., van Dijk, H. W., Keyson, D. V., & Strating, A. T. (2021). Envisioning ‘Anthropology Through Design’: A Design Interventionist Approach to Generate Anthropological Knowledge. Design Studies, 76(Sep), 101014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101014
Singh, A., Strating, A. T., Romero Herrera, N. A., Mahato, D., Keyson, D. V., & van Dijk, H. W. (2018). Exploring Peer-to-peer Returns in Off-Grid Renewable Energy Systems in Rural India: An Anthropological Perspective on Local Energy Sharing and Trading. Energy Research & Social Science, 46(Dec), 194–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.021
Singh, A., Strating, A. T., Romero Herrera, N. A., van Dijk, H. W., & Keyson, D. V. (2017). Towards an Ethnography of Electrification in Rural India: Social Relations and Values in Household Energy Exchanges. Energy Research & Social Science, 30(Aug), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.031
Sloane, M. (2019). On the Need for Mapping Design Inequalities. Design Issues, 35(4), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00559
Smith, R. C., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Loi, D., de Paula, R. A., Kambunga, A. P., Samuel, M. M., & Zaman, T. (2021). Decolonizing Design Practices: Towards Pluriversality. Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Article 83. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3441334
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, “Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
Taboada, M. B., Rojas-Lizana, S., Dutra, L. X. C., & Levu, A. V. M. (2020). Decolonial Design in Practice: Designing Meaningful and Transformative Science Communications for Navakavu, Fiji. Design and Culture, 12(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2020.1724479
Toellner, V. N. E. (2023). Unlocking Social Energy Through Relational Giving [Master´s Thesis, Delft University of Technology]. https://repository.tudelft.nl/record/uuid:51f0b20d-da6c-4ae7-b467-ae3f1c3af490
Torretta, N. B., Clark, B., & Redström, J. (2024). Reorienting Design Towards a Decolonial Ethos: Exploring Directions for Decolonial Design. Design and Culture, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2024.2356764
Tsekleves, E., Darby, A., Ahorlu, C., Pickup, R., Souza, D. de, & Boakye, D. (2020). Challenges and Opportunities in Conducting and Applying Design Research Beyond Global North to the Global South. DRS2020 Research Papers. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2020.145
Tunstall, E. (2023). Decolonizing Design: A Cultural Justice Guidebook. MIT Press.
Van Amstel, F. (2021, May 6). Pluriversal Design Methods and Critical Ontological Design. Frederick van Amstel. https://fredvanamstel.com/talks/pluriversal-design-methods-and-critical-ontological-design
Van Leeuwen, G., & Singh, A. (2023). Local Frictions in the Energy Transition: Design Anthropology for the Emergence of Energy Communities. The Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference 2023, 277–294. https://www.epicpeople.org/local-frictions-in-energy-transition-design-anthropology-for-energy-communities/
Van Leeuwen, G., & Singh, A. (2024). Design Anthropology for Ethics of Care and Emergence: Reflections from an Energy Transition Project. DRS2024 Research Papers. https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2024/researchpapers/235
Vatsyayan, K. (1996). Bharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra. Sahitya Akademi.
Vazquez, R. (2017). Precedence, Earth and the Anthropocene: Decolonizing Design. Design Philosophy Papers, 15(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2017.1303130
Zielhuis, M. R. P. (2023). Considering Design Practice: The Underutilized Opportunities in Collaborative Design Research Projects for Learning by Design Professionals [Doctoral Dissertation, Delft University of Technology]. https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:7ee30b24-cb6d-4ab7-a0b9-6ea2e7be5aa3