LA OBJECIÓN DE CONCIENCIA FARMACÉUTICA EN LA RECIENTE JURISPRUDENCIA CONSTITUCIONAL ESPAÑOLA: OTRA OPORTUNIDAD PERDIDA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7764/RLDR.1.11Keywords:
Conscientious objection, Freedom of conscience, Constitutional Court, Abortion, Pharmacist, European Court of Human RightsAbstract
In June 2015, the Spanish Constitutional Court rendered a judgment on the appeal filed by a pharmacist that had received an administrative penalty as a consequence of his conscientious objection to sell prophylactics as well as levonorgestrel (the so-called “morning-after pill”). The judgment recognized the right of conscientious objection of the pharmacist with regard to the latter product but not to the former. In this paper, the author analyses the content and reasoning of the judgment as well as its Spanish and European context. He argues that the protection offered to the objector’s freedom of conscience is correct, but he finds especially two aspects of the judgment that deserve criticism. On the one hand, the Court did not face the general question of conscientious objections as part of the freedoms guaranteed by article 16 of the Constitution, and grounded its decision on the precedent case law relating to conscientious objection to abortion. And on the other hand, it excluded the objection to selling prophylactics from the constitutional analysis without providing any reason. In the author’s view, it would be desirable to have a consistent constitutional case law on the situations of conscientious objection, making clear that —with or without a specific legislative provision— such situations must be subject to a balancing process to determine the prevailing legal interest in each case, from the perspective of the freedom of thought, conscience and religion guaranteed by article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights as interpreted in Bayatyan; with the consequence that such process must include a serious scrutiny of the refusal to grant the legal exemptions requested by objectors taking into account that limitations on freedom of conscience only are legitimate when deemed “necessary in a democratic society”.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Todos los contenidos publicados en la Revista Latinoamericana de Derecho y Religión están protegidos por una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial-Compartir Igual (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
Esta licencia permite a los lectores:
- Compartir: copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato.
- Adaptar: remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material.
Siempre que se cumplan las siguientes condiciones:
- Atribución: Debe otorgarse el crédito adecuado a los autores, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se realizaron cambios.
- No Comercial: No se puede utilizar el material con fines comerciales.
- Compartir Igual: Si se remezcla o transforma el material, debe distribuirse bajo la misma licencia.
Para más detalles sobre esta licencia, puede consultar el sitio oficial de Creative Commons en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.