![##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##](https://revistadisena.uc.cl/public/journals/30/pageHeaderLogoImage_en_US.png)
The rise of descriptive representation after the 2017 quota law invites exploration of the impact on substantive representation. This work classifies the pro-woman statements, distinguishing those that reproduce gender stereotypes (practical interests) from those that break with their reproduction (strategic interests). The data were collected through semi-structured interviews from a proportional random sample by political party and sex in the last two legislatures (2014-18/2018-22). It was shown that non-sexist statements about women’s interests of a strategic nature increased from 30.4% to 48%. The largest number of these phrases were concentrated in the discourse of the youngest left and center-left deputies in 2014-18; expanding to young men and women of the center-right in 2018-22.