Effects of steel slag fineness and MEROS ash on GGBFS-based geopolymers

Authors

  • Mahfuz Pekgöz Civil Engineering Department, Karabük University, Karabük (Turkey)
  • İlker Tekin Civil Engineering Department, Karabük University, Karabük (Turkey)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.24.3.582

Keywords:

Steel slag, MEROS® ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag, geopolymer, microstructure.

Abstract

In this study, magnetic and non-magnetic steel slag (SS) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) with two different fineness levels were utilized in the production of geopolymers. In the synthesis of geopolymers, a triple alkaline activator comprising MEROS® ash (MA), a by-product of the iron and steel industry, in combination with Na2SiO3(aq) and NaOH, was employed. Workability was conducted on fresh geopolymers, while compressive strength, water absorption, shrinkage, and microstructural analyses were performed on hardened geopolymers. The experimental findings demonstrate that the physical, mechanical, and microstructural properties of geopolymers produced with coarse (<1 mm) and fine (<125 µm) SS particles were comparable; however, the grinding process for coarse SS was approximately 9.6 times more energy-efficient than that for fine SS, thereby demonstrating a significant advantage in energy savings. The presence of magnetic and non-magnetic steel slag, with particle sizes smaller than 1 mm, has been shown to reduce shrinkage in geopolymers. The MA significantly enhances compressive strength and workability. The highest compressive strengths were obtained on the Mc2s, which was produced using magnetic steel slag with a size of less than 1 mm and 5% sintering ash, reaching 48.85 MPa at 2 day and 62.0 MPa at 28 day. The microstructure analysis indicates that geopolymer gels, such as C-S-H and C(N)-A-S-H, contain sulfur forms derived from the MA. This work differs from previous SS/GGBFS geopolymer studies by systematically comparing magnetic and non-magnetic steel slag at different fineness levels and by quantifying the energy savings achieved through the use of MEROS® ash in a ternary activator system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdellatief, M., Elsafi, M., Murali, G., and ElNemr, A. (2025). Comparative evaluation of hybrid machine learning models for predicting the strength of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete enhanced with Gaussian noise augmentation. Journal of Building Engineering, 111, 113302. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2025.113302

Adediran, A., Yliniemi, J., Lemougna, P. N., Perumal, P., and Illikainen, M. (2023). Recycling high volume Fe-rich fayalite slag in blended alkali-activated materials: Effect of ladle and blast furnace slags on the fresh and hardened state properties. Journal of Building Engineering, 63, 105436. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2022.105436

Murali, G., Wong, L. S., Abdulkadir, I., Algaifi, H. A., and Abdellatief, M. (2025). Sustainable transformation of waste phosphogypsum into geopolymer concrete: Comprehensive review on strength, durability, and microstructural characteristics. Journal of Building Engineering, 111, 113597. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2025.113597

Nica, S. L., Nica, V., Grigoras, V. C., Varganici, C. D., Popovici, D., Hulubei, C., and Ioan, S. (2015). Influence of two structural phases of Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3 on the properties of polyimide/iron oxide composites. Polymer International, 64(9), 1172–1181. https://doi.org/10.1002/PI.4888;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:1934256X;ISSUE:ISSUE:DOI

Pekgöz, M., Günaydın, O., and Güçlüer, K. (2021). An investigation of concrete stress-strain behavior by the image analysis method. Journal of Construction, 20(2), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.20.2.308

Pekgöz, M., and Tekin, İ. (2024). Effect of Glass Industry Waste on the Physical, Mechanical, and Durability Properties of Slag-Based Geopolymer Composites Produced with a Ternary Alkali Activator System. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(24), 502–515. https://doi.org/10.54365/ADYUMBD.1590079

Tekin, İ., Pekgöz, M., Saleh, N. K., Kiamahalleh, M. V., Gholampour, A., Gencel, O., and Ozbakkaloglu, T. (2025). Compatibility of melamine formaldehyde- and polycarboxylate-based superplasticizers on slag/sintering ash-based geopolymer paste. Construction and Building Materials, 458, 139681. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2024.139681

Wu, Y. K., Hu, X. S., Hu, R., Han, T., and Yu, J. L. (2017). Study on the application of an activator for steel slag powder–cement in muddy soil. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2017.1357872

Alanyali, H., Çöl, M., Yilmaz, M., and Karagöz, Ş. (2009). Concrete Produced by Steel-Making Slag (Basic Oxygen Furnace) Addition in Portland Cement. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, 6(6), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1744-7402.2008.02317.X

Al-Majidi, M. H., Lampropoulos, A., Cundy, A., and Meikle, S. (2016). Development of geopolymer mortar under ambient temperature for in situ applications. Construction and Building Materials, 120, 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2016.05.085

ASTM C109, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars, American Society for Testing and Materials, 2013, USA.

ASTM C1437-15. (2015). Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar.

ASTM C1585-20, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic-Cement Concretes, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, www.astm.org.

Chen, Z., Gong, Z., Jiao, Y., Wang, Y., Shi, K., and Wu, J. (2020). Moisture stability improvement of asphalt mixture considering the surface characteristics of steel slag coarse aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 251, 118987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118987

Chindaprasirt, P., Chareerat, T., Hatanaka, S., and Cao, T. (2011). High-Strength Geopolymer Using Fine High-Calcium Fly Ash. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23(3), 264–270. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000161

Deb, P. S., Sarker, P. K., and Barbhuiya, S. (2016a). Sorptivity and acid resistance of ambient-cured geopolymer mortars containing nano-silica. Cement and Concrete Composites, 72, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2016.06.017

Deb, P. S., Sarker, P. K., and Barbhuiya, S. (2016b). Sorptivity and acid resistance of ambient-cured geopolymer mortars containing nano-silica. Cement and Concrete Composites, 72, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2016.06.017

Dominguez, A. G. B., Valerio-Cuadros, M. I., Borja-Castro, L. E., Valencia-Bedregal, R. A., Santibañez, J. F., Suarez, S. M. E., Cabrera-Tinoco, H., Moreno, N. O., Barnes, C. H. W., and Valladares, L. D. L. S. (2022). Characterization and Mössbauer spectroscopy of steel slag generated in the ladle furnance in SIDERPERU steel plant. Hyperfine Interactions, 243(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10751-022-01799-X/TABLES/3

Elzeadani, M., Bompa, D. V., and Elghazouli, A. Y. (2022). One part alkali activated materials: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Building Engineering, 57, 104871. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2022.104871

Furlani, E., Maschio, S., Magnan, M., Aneggi, E., Andreatta, F., Lekka, M., Lanzutti, A., and Fedrizzi, L. (2018). Synthesis and characterization of geopolymers containing blends of unprocessed steel slag and metakaolin: The role of slag particle size. Ceramics International, 44(5), 5226–5232. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2017.12.131

Gan, Y., Li, C., Zou, J., Wang, W., and Yu, T. (2022). Evaluation of the impact factors on the leaching risk of steel slag and its asphalt mixture. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16, e01067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01067

Gómez-Casero, M. A., Pérez-Villarejo, L., Castro, E., and Eliche-Quesada, D. (2021). Effect of steel slag and curing temperature on the improvement in technological properties of biomass bottom ash-based alkali-activated materials. Construction and Building Materials, 302, 124205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124205

He, Z., Hu, X., and Chou, K. C. (2022). Synergetic modification of industrial basic oxygen furnace slag and copper slag for efficient iron recovery. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 165, 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSEP.2022.07.044

Hledik, C., Goetz, M., Ottner, F., and Fürhacker, M. (2021). MEROS Dust Quality of Different Plants and Its Potential Further Uses. Metals 2021, Vol. 11, Page 840, 11(5), 840. https://doi.org/10.3390/MET11050840

Hojati, M., and Radlińska, A. (2017). Shrinkage and strength development of alkali-activated fly ash-slag binary cements. Construction and Building Materials, 150, 808–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2017.06.040

Izquierdo, M., Querol, X., Davidovits, J., Antenucci, D., Nugteren, H., and Fernández-Pereira, C. (2009). Coal fly ash-slag-based geopolymers: Microstructure and metal leaching. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 166(1), 561–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2008.11.063

Jang, J. G., and Lee, H. K. (2016). Effect of fly ash characteristics on delayed high-strength development of geopolymers. Construction and Building Materials, 102, 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2015.10.172

Jang, J. G., Lee, N. K., and Lee, H. K. (2014). Fresh and hardened properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag pastes with superplasticizers. Construction and Building Materials, 50, 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2013.09.048

Jiang, L., Bao, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, G., Zhang, X., Han, F., and Yang, Q. (2019). Structural Characteristics and Hydration Kinetics of Oxidized Steel Slag in a CaO-FeO-SiO 2 -MgO System. High Temperature Materials and Processes, 38(2019), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1515/HTMP-2017-0163

Kovtun, M., Kearsley, E. P., and Shekhovtsova, J. (2015). Dry powder alkali-activated slag cements. Https://Doi.Org/10.1680/Jadcr.14.00078, 27(8), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1680/JADCR.14.00078

Kua, H. W. (2015). Integrated policies to promote sustainable use of steel slag for construction—A consequential life cycle embodied energy and greenhouse gas emission perspective. Energy and Buildings, 101, 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2015.04.036

Kumar, A., and Dixit, C. K. (2017). Methods for characterization of nanoparticles. Advances in Nanomedicine for the Delivery of Therapeutic Nucleic Acids, 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100557-6.00003-1

Lai, M. H., Lin, Y. H., Jin, Y. Y., Fei, Q., Wang, Z. C., and Ho, J. C. M. (2023). Uni-axial behaviour of steel slag concrete-filled-steel-tube columns with external confinement. Thin-Walled Structures, 185, 110562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.110562

Li, S., Liu, G., Zheng, M., Liu, W., Li, J., Wang, M., Li, C., and Chen, Y. (2017). Unintentional production of persistent chlorinated and brominated organic pollutants during iron ore sintering processes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 331, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2017.02.027

Li, Y., Lei, W., Zhang, Q., Yang, Q., He, X., Su, Y., Tan, H., Liu, J., and Wang, G. (2022a). Synergistic effects of steel slag and wet grinding on ambient cured ground granulated blast furnace slag activated by sodium sulfate. Construction and Building Materials, 349, 128661. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2022.128661

Li, Y., Lei, W., Zhang, Q., Yang, Q., He, X., Su, Y., Tan, H., Liu, J., and Wang, G. (2022b). Synergistic effects of steel slag and wet grinding on ambient cured ground granulated blast furnace slag activated by sodium sulfate. Construction and Building Materials, 349, 128661. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2022.128661

Liu, X., Wang, D. zhi, Li, Z. wei, Ouyang, W., Bao, Y. ping, and Gu, C. (2023). Efficient separation of iron elements from steel slag based on magnetic separation process. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 23, 2362–2370. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMRT.2023.01.186

Mahmoodi, O., Siad, H., Lachemi, M., and Sahmaran, M. (2023). Effects of Chemical Parameters on the Fresh State Properties of CDW-Based Geopolymer Systems. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 248, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1004-3_8/COVER

Nunes, V. A., and Borges, P. H. R. (2021). Recent advances in the reuse of steel slags and future perspectives as binder and aggregate for alkali-activated materials. Construction and Building Materials, 281, 122605. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.122605

Peng, M. X., Wang, Z. H., Shen, S. H., Xiao, Q. G., Li, L. J., Tang, Y. C., and Hu, L. L. (2017). Alkali fusion of bentonite to synthesize one-part geopolymer cements cured at elevated temperatures by comparison with two-part ones. Construction and Building Materials, 130, 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2016.11.010

Provis, J. L. (2018). Alkali-activated materials. Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2017.02.009

Qian, L., Chun, T., Long, H., Li, J., Di, Z., Meng, Q., and Wang, P. (2018). Emission reduction research and development of PCDD/Fs in the iron ore sintering. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSEP.2018.04.014

Rashad, A. M., Bai, Y., Basheer, P. A. M., Milestone, N. B., and Collier, N. C. (2013). Hydration and properties of sodium sulfate activated slag. Cement and Concrete Composites, 37(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2012.12.010

Rattanasak, U., and Chindaprasirt, P. (2009). Influence of NaOH solution on the synthesis of fly ash geopolymer. Minerals Engineering, 22(12), 1073–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MINENG.2009.03.022

Ryu, G. S., Lee, Y. B., Koh, K. T., and Chung, Y. S. (2013). The mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with alkaline activators. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2013.05.069

Singh, B., Rahman, M. R., Paswan, R., and Bhattacharyya, S. K. (2016). Effect of activator concentration on the strength, ITZ and drying shrinkage of fly ash/slag geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 118, 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2016.05.008

Song, M., Liu, J., and Xu, S. (2015). Characterization and solidification/stabilization of iron-ore sintering gas cleaning residue. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 17(4), 790–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10163-014-0312-4/TABLES/4

Song, Q., Guo, M. Z., Wang, L., and Ling, T. C. (2021). Use of steel slag as sustainable construction materials: A review of accelerated carbonation treatment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 173, 105740. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2021.105740

Song, W., Zhu, Z., Peng, Y., Wan, Y., Xu, X., Pu, S., Song, S., and Wei, Y. (2019). Effect of steel slag on fresh, hardened and microstructural properties of high-calcium fly ash based geopolymers at standard curing condition. Construction and Building Materials, 229, 116933. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.116933

Sun, J., Zhang, Z., Zhuang, S., and He, W. (2020). Hydration properties and microstructure characteristics of alkali–activated steel slag. Construction and Building Materials, 241, 118141. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.118141

Tekin, I. (2016). Properties of NaOH activated geopolymer with marble, travertine and volcanic tuff wastes. Construction and Building Materials, 127, 607–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2016.10.038

Temuujin, J., Williams, R. P., and van Riessen, A. (2009). Effect of mechanical activation of fly ash on the properties of geopolymer cured at ambient temperature. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(12–13), 5276–5280. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2009.03.016

The World Steel Association. Crude steel production in December 2022 and throughout the year [EB/OL].

UYSAL, F. F., and BAHAR, S. (2018). Slag types and utilization areas. Trakya University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 19(1), 37–52.

Wang, H., Li, H., and Yan, F. (2005). Synthesis and mechanical properties of metakaolinite-based geopolymer. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 1–3(268), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2005.01.016

Wang, Q., Wang, D., and Zhuang, S. (2017). The soundness of steel slag with different free CaO and MgO contents. Construction and Building Materials, 151, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2017.06.077

Xiong, G., and Guo, X. (2022). Effects and mechanism of superplasticizers and precursor proportions on the fresh properties of fly ash – slag powder based geopolymers. Construction and Building Materials, 350, 128734. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2022.128734

Xu, C., Ni, W., Li, K., Zhang, S., and Xu, D. (2021). Activation mechanisms of three types of industrial by-product gypsums on steel slag–granulated blast furnace slag-based binders. Construction and Building Materials, 288, 123111. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.123111

Yi, H., Xu, G., Cheng, H., Wang, J., Wan, Y., and Chen, H. (2012). An Overview of Utilization of Steel Slag. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 16, 791–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENV.2012.10.108

Yong-Feng, D., Tong-Wei, Z., Yu, Z., Qian-Wen, L., and Qiong, W. (2017). Mechanical behavior and microstructure of steel slag-based composite and its application for soft clay stabilization. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2017.1357787

You, N., Li, B., Cao, R., Shi, J., Chen, C., and Zhang, Y. (2019). The influence of steel slag and ferronickel slag on the properties of alkali-activated slag mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 227, 116614. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.07.340

Zhang, L., Wang, Q., Zheng, Y., Cang, Z., Gisele, K., Yu, C., and Cang, D. (2021). Synergistic effect and mechanism of waste glass on the mechanical properties and autoclave stability of cementitious materials containing steel slag. Construction and Building Materials, 311, 125295. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.125295.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30 — Updated on 2025-12-30

Versions

How to Cite

Pekgöz, M., & Tekin, İlker . (2025). Effects of steel slag fineness and MEROS ash on GGBFS-based geopolymers. Journal of Construction, 24(3), 582–602. https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.24.3.582