Impact of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) on physical-mechanical properties and microstructure of styrene polyacrylic (SPA) polymer modified mortars

Hichem Berkak; Zoubir Makhloufi; Moustafa Habib Chenafi

doi:10.7764/RDLC.24.2.256

Authors

Hichem Berkak Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Sciences and Technology Houari Boumediene USTHB, Algiers (Algeria)
Zoubir Makhloufi Structures Rehabilitation and Materials Laboratory (SREML), University Amar Telidji, Laghouat (Algeria)
Moustafa Habib Chenafi Structures Rehabilitation and Materials Laboratory (SREML), University Amar Telidji, Laghouat (Algeria)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.24.2.256

Keywords:

Polymer-modified mortar (PMM), supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), SPA latex, microstructure, physical-mechanical properties.

Abstract

Polymer-modified mortars (PMMs) have attracted increasing attention for their promising properties, multiple applications, and relatively affordable cost compared to other polymer mortars. This study investigates the impact of substituting 30% of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) with SCMs on the physical-mechanical and microstructural properties of PMM based on a new type of latex polymer, styrene polyacrylic (SPA). This is to contribute to the development of more effective and sustainable PMM, while reducing the carbon footprint associated with cement use. For this purpose, an OPC mortar and a total of 7 mortar mixtures were designed, all with a polymer-to-binder (P/B) ratio (in powder) of 7.5%. The control PMM mixture contains only OPC and SPA latex as binders while the remaining mixtures include binary and ternary cement mixtures, composed of OPC, silica fume (SF), natural pozzolan (NP) and limestone fillers (LF). Tests of workability of fresh mortars and dry weight were carried out and flexural tensile and compressive strengths of hardened mortars were measured over a curing period ranging from 3 to 365 days. The microstructure of PMMs was also studied using XRD analysis and SEM images. The results demonstrated the efficacy of LF integration in improving the workability of PMM while NP or SF addition has a detrimental effect on the rheological properties of PMM, as the flow time increased by 24% and 37%, respectively, so it is necessary to increase the superplasticizer content. The incorporation of SCMs also resulted in the production of lightweight PMMs as evidenced by the reduced density of SCMs. For PMMs with binary binders, the replacement of OPC with 30% SF leads to a significant increase in compressive strength after 28 days ranging from 7 to 15%, along with an improvement in the PMM microstructure. Finally, it should be noted that the combination of NP and SF represents the optimal formulation for the PMM ternary mixture. After 28 days, this combination noticeably increases compressive strength by 8–10% without any decrease in tensile strength.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afridi, M. U. K., Ohama, Y., Demura, K., and Iqbal, M. Z. (2003). Development of polymer films by the coalescence of polymer particles in powdered and aqueous polymer-modified mortars. Cement and Concrete Research, 33(11), 1715-1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01094-3

Afzal, A., Kausar, A., and Siddiq, M. (2016). Technical relevance of polymer/cement/carbon nanotube composite: Opportunities and challenges. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 55(16), 1743-1764. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2016.1163608

Ahmed, S. F. U. (2011). Mechanical and durability properties of mortars modified with combined polymer and supplementary cementitious materials. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23(9), 1311-1319. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000300

Almeida, A. E. D. S., and Sichieri, E. P. (2006). Mineralogical study of polymer modified mortar with silica fume. Construction and Building Materials, 20(10), 882-887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.029

Banfill, P. F. G., Bellagraa, L., and Benaggoun, L. (1993). Properties of polymer-modified mortars made with blended cements. Advances in Cement Research, 5(19), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.1993.5.19.103

Belbachir, B., Benosman, A. S., Taïbi, H., Mouli, M., and Senhadji, Y. (2018). The thermal properties of mortars modified by the effect of combining polymers and SCMs. Journal of Building Materials and Structures, 5(1), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.34118/jbms.v5i1.41

Benali, Y., and Ghomari, F. (2017). Latex influence on the mechanical behavior and durability of cementitious materials. Journal of adhesion science and Technology, 31(3), 219-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1208378

Ben-Dor, L., Heitner-Wirguin, C., and Diab, H. (1985). The effect of ionic polymers on the hydration of C3S. Cement and Concrete Research, 15(4), 681-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(85)90069-9

Berkak, H., Bederina, M., and Makhloufi, Z. (2020). Physico-mechanical and microstructural properties of an eco-friendly limestone mortar modified with styrene-polyacrylic latex. Journal of Building Engineering, 32, 101463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101463

Berkak, H., Makhloufi, Z., and Bederina, M. (2019). Microstructural study of Styrene Polyacrylic (SPA) latex modified mortars. Journal of Materials and Engineering Structures «JMES», 6(4), 535-545.

Bhattacharya, M., and Harish, K. V. (2018). An integrated approach for studying the hydration of portland cement systems containing silica fume. Con-struction and Building Materials, 188, 1179-1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.114

Bureau, L., Alliche, A., Pilvin, P., and Pascal, S. (2001). Mechanical characterization of a styrene–butadiene modified mortar. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 308(1-2), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01980-8

Caimi, S., Timmerer, E., Banfi, M., Storti, G., and Morbidelli, M. (2018). Core-shell morphology of redispersible powders in polymer-cement waterproof mortars. Polymers, 10(10), 1122. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10101122

Czarnecki, L., and Sokołowska, J. J. (2011). Optimization of polymer-cement coating composition using material model. Key Engineering Materials, 466, 191-199. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.466.191

Dakwale, V. A., Pachpor, P. D., Mahesh, S., and Namdeo, D. (2023). Use of metakaolin with polymer modified concrete in repairing of structures. Materi-als Today: Proceedings, 72, 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.061

El-Dakroury, A. M. (2007). Mechanical and chemical properties of polyvinyl alcohol modified cement mortar with silica fume used as matrix including radioactive waste.

Gao, J. M., Qian, C. X., Wang, B., and Morino, K. (2002). Experimental study on properties of polymer-modified cement mortars with silica fume. Cement and Concrete Research, 32(1), 41-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00626-3

Guo, Z., Ru, Y., Song, W., Liu, Z., Zhang, X., and Qiao, J. (2017). Water‐soluble polymers with strong photoluminescence through an eco‐friendly and low‐cost route. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 38(14), 1700099. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201700099

Hou, D., Yu, J., and Wang, P. (2019). Molecular dynamics modeling of the structure, dynamics, energetics and mechanical properties of cement-polymer nanocomposite. Composites Part B: Engineering, 162, 433-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.142

Jiang, Y. J., Li, L., Wang, H. S., Wang, R., and Tian, Q. (2015). Influence of acrylic emulsion on polymer-cement waterproof coating. Advanced Materials Research, 1129, 263-269. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1129.263

Kim, J. H., Robertson, R. E., and Naaman, A. E. (1999). Structure and properties of poly (vinyl alcohol)-modified mortar and concrete. Cement and Con-crete Research, 29(3), 407-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00246-4

Kwon, H. M., Nguyen, T. N., and Le, T. A. (2009). Improvement of the strength of acrylic emulsion polymer-modified mortar in high temperature and high humidity by blast furnace slag. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 13, 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-009-0023-x

Latroch, N., Benosman, A. S., Bouhamou, N. E., Belbachir, B., Senhadji, Y., Taïbi, H., and Mouli, M. (2016). Testing of composite mortars based on supplementary cementitious materials: estimating durability and thermal properties. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, 27, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JERA.27.27

Lee, H. X. D., Wong, H. S., and Buenfeld, N. R. (2016). Self-sealing of cracks in concrete using superabsorbent polymers. Cement and concrete Research, 79, 194-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.09.008

Li, L., Wang, R., and Lu, Q. (2018). Influence of polymer latex on the setting time, mechanical properties and durability of calcium sulfoaluminate ce-ment mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 169, 911-922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.005

Lothenbach, B., Scrivener, K., and Hooton, R. D. (2011). Supplementary cementitious materials. Cement and concrete research, 41(12), 1244-1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.001

Meddah, M. S., Suzuki, M., and Sato, R. (2011). Influence of a combination of expansive and shrinkage-reducing admixture on autogenous deformation and self-stress of silica fume high-performance concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 25(1), 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.033

Mohammed, A. S., Mahmood, W., Qadir, W. S., Ghafor, K., and Kurda, R. (2023). Microstructure tests, flow, and mechanical behavior of polymerized cement mortar. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(4), 101922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101922

Mohammed, I. F., and Abed, J. M. (2023). The effect of utilizing epoxy latex and silica fume on the mechanical performance of cement repair mortars. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2862(1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0172739

Pascal, S., Alliche, A., and Pilvin, P. (2004). Mechanical behaviour of polymer modified mortars. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 380(1-2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.03.049

Rajak, D. K., Pagar, D. D., Menezes, P. L., and Linul, E. (2019). Fiber-reinforced polymer composites: Manufacturing, properties, and applications. Poly-mers, 11(10), 1667. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11101667

Ramli, M., and Akhavan Tabassi, A. (2012). Effects of different curing regimes on engineering properties of polymer-modified mortar. Journal of materi-als in civil engineering, 24(4), 468-478. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000394

Rashid, K., Ueda, T., Zhang, D., Miyaguchi, K., and Nakai, H. (2015). Experimental and analytical investigations on the behavior of interface between concrete and polymer cement mortar under hygrothermal conditions. Construction and Building materials, 94, 414-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.035

Ray, I., Gupta, A. P., and Biswas, M. (1996). Physicochemical studies on single and combined effects of latex and superplasticiser on Portland cement mortar. Cement and Concrete Composites, 18(5), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0958-9465(96)00025-X

Salih, A., Rafiq, S., Mahmood, W., Hind, A. D., Noaman, R., Ghafor, K., and Qadir, W. (2020). Systemic multi-scale approaches to predict the flowability at various temperature and mechanical properties of cement paste modified with nano-calcium carbonate. Construction and Building Materials, 262, 120777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120777

Shaukat, A. J., Feng, H., Khitab, A., and Jan, A. (2020). Effect of admixtures on mechanical properties of cementitious mortar. Civil Engineering Journal, 6(11), 2175-2187.

Song, H. W., Pack, S. W., Nam, S. H., Jang, J. C., and Saraswathy, V. (2010). Estimation of the permeability of silica fume cement concrete. Construction and building Materials, 24(3), 315-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.033

Sun, G., Liang, R., Zhang, J., Li, Z., and Weng, L. T. (2017). Mechanism of cement paste reinforced by ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene powder and thermotropic liquid crystalline copolyester fiber with enhanced mechanical properties. Cement and Concrete Composites, 78, 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.12.011

Van Tittelboom, K., and De Belie, N. (2013). Self-healing in cementitious materials—A review. Materials, 6(6), 2182-2217. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6062182

Wang, D., Shi, C., Farzadnia, N., Shi, Z., Jia, H., and Ou, Z. (2018). A review on use of limestone powder in cement-based materials: Mechanism, hydration and microstructures. Construction and Building Materials, 181, 659-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.075

Xu, A., Zhang, J. L., and Zeng, L. (2014). Research status and prospects of polymeric grouting material. Concrete, 10, 141-144.

Yan, R., Wang, L., Ni, Y., Zhang, S., He, Z., and Guan, B. (2024). A Study on the Properties of Composite Modified Mortar with Styrene–Butadiene Rub-ber Latex and Silica Fume. Polymers, 16(5), 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16050697

Zhang, S., Li, G. Z., and Ning, C. (2011). Properties of the Mortar Modified with the Styrene-Acrylic Emulsion. Advanced Materials Research, 194, 1022-1025. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.194-196.1022

Zhao, F. Q., Li, H., Liu, S. J., and Chen, J. B. (2011). Preparation and properties of an environment friendly polymer-modified waterproof mortar. Con-struction and Building Materials, 25(5), 2635-2638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.012

Zouch, A., Mamindy-Pajany, Y., Ennahal, I., Abriak, N. E., and Ksibi, M. (2020). An eco-friendly epoxy polymer binder for the treatment of Tunisian harbor sediments: Laboratory investigations for beneficial reuse. Waste Management and Research, 38(8), 876-885. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X20910234