Rethinking Sister Cities for the Anthropocene: Cape Town and Reykjavik ― A Reflective Dialogue
Main Article Content
Abstract
This design dialogue offers a glimpse into a collaborative environmental design project: Sister Cities for the Anthropocene (SCA). The core idea of SCA is to reactivate and reimagine the Sister Cities International program of the mid-20th century for the existential crises of the 21st century. In the introductory section of this dialogue, the environmental anthropologists who conceived Sister Cities for the Anthropocene detail the key principles of the concept as well as its scientific basis. The conversation then turns toward engagement with colleagues in Cape Town and Reykjavík, with expertise in issues of climate adaptation, environmental justice, and ecological systems in their respective cities. This dialogue exemplifies the first phase of the SCA design process: a series of brainstorming sessions among experts on what the optimal goals and forms that a Sister Cities for the Anthropocene relationship might take.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
All contents of this electronic edition are distributed under the Creative Commons license of "Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internacional" (CC-BY-SA). Any total or partial reproduction of the material must mention its origin.
The rights of the published images belong to their authors, who grant to Diseña the license for its use. The management of the permits and the authorization of the publication of the images (or of any material) that contains copyright and its consequent rights of reproduction in this publication is the sole responsibility of the authors of the articles.
References
Davis, H., & Todd, Z. (2017). On the Importance of a Date, or, Decolonizing the Anthropocene. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 16(4), 761–780. https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v16i4.1539
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371816
Gatt, C. (Ed.). (2017). The Voices of the Pages. Aberdeen University Press.
Green, L., Ojemaye, C., Petrik, L., Barnes, J., Solomon, N., Beukes, A., Farr, V., & Zackon, M. (2025). Contaminant Denialism in Water Governance. Water Resources Research, 61(7), e2024WR037875. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037875
Howe, C., & Boyer, D. (2024). Sister Cities for the Anthropocene. Nature Cities, 1(5), 330–331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-024-00067-z
Marino, E. (2018). Adaptation Privilege and Voluntary Buyouts: Perspectives on Ethnocentrism in Sea Level Rise Relocation and Retreat Policies in the US. Global Environmental Change, 49, 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.01.002
Pálsson, G. (2024). The Last of Its Kind: The Search for the Great Auk and the Discovery of Extinction. Princeton University Press.
Sister Cities International (2006). Peace Through People: 50 Years of Global Citizenship. Butler Books.
Thomas, J. A. (2022). Altered Earth: Getting the Anthropocene Right. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042369
Tironi, M. (2023). How to Become Terrestrial: Design for Planetary Habitability. In H. Palmarola, E. Medina, & P. Alonso (Eds.), How to Design a Revolution: The Chilean Road to Design (pp. 274–293). Lars Müller.
Tsing, A. L., Bubandt, N., Gan, E., & Swanson, H. A. (Eds.). (2017). Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene. University of Minnesota Press.
Wood, J. (2022). Metadesigning: Designing in the Anthropocene. Taylor & Francis.