The Ethics of an Aesthetics of Wonder for Planetary Care
Main Article Content
Abstract
In design, the expression of values through form and experience is often referred to as aesthetics. In response to the ecological crisis, we explore wonder as a design aesthetics for planetary care. This exploration occurs through the presentation and critique of three seasonal activities with children in Sweden, aimed at inspiring local ecological curiosity: Appreciating the Wind, Looking for Frog Eggs, and Making Natural Perfumes. From these activities, we reflect upon the ethics of an aesthetics of wonder. This includes addressing the prioritization of human experience and the commodification of nature in design. We offer three contributions: defining and positioning wonder as a possible design aesthetics for planetary care, presenting three seasonal activities that situate wonder as an aesthetics in practice, and offering reflections on the ethics of wonder based on a critique of the activities.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
All contents of this electronic edition are distributed under the Creative Commons license of "Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internacional" (CC-BY-SA). Any total or partial reproduction of the material must mention its origin.
The rights of the published images belong to their authors, who grant to Diseña the license for its use. The management of the permits and the authorization of the publication of the images (or of any material) that contains copyright and its consequent rights of reproduction in this publication is the sole responsibility of the authors of the articles.
References
Anggarendra, R., & Brereton, M. (2016). Engaging Children with Nature through Environmental HCI. Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, 310–315. https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3010981
Ávila, M. (2022). Designing for Interdependence: A Poetics of Relating. Bloomsbury.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
Daston, L., & Park, K. (1998). Wonders and the Order of Nature 1150–1750. Zone Books.
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371816
Fry, T. (2020). Defuturing: A New Design Philosophy. Bloomsbury.
Fry, T., & Nocek, A. (Eds.). (2020). Design in Crisis: New Worlds, Philosophies and Practices. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003021469
Haraway, D. J. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press.
Hauser, S., Redström, J., & Wiltse, H. (2023). The Widening Rift between Aesthetics and Ethics in the Design of Computational Things. AI & SOCIETY, 38(1), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01279-w
Helms, K. (2023). Designing with Care: Self-Centered Research for Interaction Design Otherwise [Doctoral Dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology]. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-322784
Hickey-Moody, A., Knight, L., & Florence, E. (2021). Childhood, Citizenship, and the Anthropocene: Posthuman Publics and Civics. Rowman & Littlefield.
Ikeya, Y., Barati, B., & Wensveen, S. (2025). Aesthetics in Designing with the Living: A Systematic Review of Critical Perspectives and Artefacts. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713343
Jönsson, L. (2015). Design Events: On Explorations of a Non-Anthropocentric Framework in Design [Doctoral Dissertation, The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts]. https://adk.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/design-events-on-explorations-of-a-non-anthropocentric-framework-/prizes/
Karana, E., Barati, B., & Giaccardi, E. (2020). Living Artefacts: Conceptualizing Livingness as a Material Quality in Everyday Artefacts. International Journal of Design, 14(3).
Keune, S., & Ståhl, Å. (2025). Seasonal Design. Nordes 2025: Relational Design. https://doi.org/10.21606/nordes.2025.55
Liu, S.-Y. (Cyn), Liu, J., Dew, K., Zdziarska, P., Livio, M., & Bardzell, S. (2019). Exploring Noticing as Method in Design Research. Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion, 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3319995
MacLure, M. (2013). The Wonder of Data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613487863
Mårtensson, F., Wiström, B., Hedblom, M., Litsmark, A., Gabriel, A., Herngren, L., Ågren, J., & Sang, Å. O. (2025). Creating Nature-Based Play Settings for Children through Looking, Listening, Learning and Modifying in a Swedish Landscape Laboratory. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 7(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-024-00208-7
Murris, K. (2016). The Posthuman Child: Educational Transformation through Philosophy with Picturebooks. Routledge.
Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9188.001.0001
Nicenboim, I., Karana, E., McQuillan, H., Devendorf, L., Kakehi, Y., Bell, F., Speed, C., Oogjes, D., Yao, L., Søndergaard, M. L. J., Helms, K., & Withers, S. (2025, May 26). Regenerative Material Ecologies in HCI. Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’25). https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3716303
Nicenboim, I., Oogjes, D., Biggs, H., & Nam, S. (2023). Decentering Through Design: Bridging Posthuman Theory with More-than-Human Design Practices. Human-Computer Interaction, 40(1–4), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2023.2283535
Nordqvist, S., Larsson, E.-L., & Danielsson, K. (2023). Året runt med Pettson och Findus. Opal.
Österlund, M., Palmgren, A.-C., & Ahlbäck, P. M. (Eds.). (2024). Tidsligheter: Ekokritiska, barnlitterär och kulturteoretiska perspektiv pa tid. SLS.
Poikolainen Rosén, A., Sanchez, C., & Epp, F. A. (2024). ‘Does Phosphorus Want to Sound Like That?’: Experiencing More-Than-Human Futures. DRS2024 Research Papers. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.829
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. University of Minnesota Press.
Sehgal, M., & Wilkie, A. (Eds.). (2024). More-Than-Human Aesthetics: Venturing Beyond the Bifurcation of Nature. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.9692635
Smith, N. E. (2019). Decentering Design: Bees, Biomimicry, and the Sixth Mass Extinction [Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University]. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2320955742/abstract/5EF79D649ACA415FPQ/1
Stengers, I. (2011). Wondering About Materialism: Diderot’s Egg. In L. R. Bryant, N. Srnicek, & G. Harman (Eds.), The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism (pp. 368‒380). re.press. https://philarchive.org/rec/STEWAM
Stirling, S. (2021). Rewild Your Life: Reconnect to Nature Over 52 Seasonal Projects. Hardie Grant Books.
Tronto, J. (1993). Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. Routledge.
Vanni, I., & Crosby, A. (2023). Place-Based Methodologies for Design Research: An Ethnographic Approach. Design Studies, 85, 101168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101168
Vella, K., Dobson, M., Rodgers, S., Om, C., Bircanin, F., Dema, T., Pillai, J., Murcia, K., & Brereton, M. (2023). Wired, Wild, Wonderful: A Scoping Review of Early Childhood Nature Connections Fostered by Digital Technologies. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 38, 100619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2023.100619
Wiedenman, E. M., Lee, K. M., & Hunleth, J. (2023). The Adult in the Room: The Push and Pull of Parental Involvement in Research with Children. Childhood, 30(3), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/09075682231176899