Not Knowing to Reimagine. Toward an Ignorance-Oriented Design in Times of Artificial Intelligence

Main Article Content

Martín Tironi

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has gained prominence in public debate, not only as a tool to optimize processes, but also as a dominant narrative of development and progress. These imaginaries, grounded in references from the Global North, tend to define the possible and desirable futures of AI in an exclusive manner. With the aim of decentering these hegemonic visions and creating space for a Latin American situated technodiversity, this article analyzes the implementation of an experimental critical design workshop—carried out with actors from the Chilean technological ecosystem—and its failure to generate alternative imaginaries. Based on this experience, a reflection on the role of failure and ignorance in creative practices is proposed. It is argued that the emergence of failure can activate forms of generative ignorance, opening up fertile methodological and analytical spaces for rethinking our relationship with AI. The article conceptualizes the exploratory notion of an ignorance-oriented design: a practice that learns from excess, stays with the trouble, and recognizes the value of what we do not yet know or cannot anticipate. It aims to contribute to a design epistemology that is committed to the possibilities that ignorance introduces to creative processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Tironi, M. (2025). Not Knowing to Reimagine. Toward an Ignorance-Oriented Design in Times of Artificial Intelligence. Diseña, (27), Article.3. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.27.Article.3
Section
Original Articles (part 1)
Author Biography

Martín Tironi, School of Design, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Director and faculty member at the School of Design of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (PUC). Director of the Millennium Nucleus FAIR (Futures of Artificial Intelligence Research). He holds a PhD from Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation (CSI), École des Mines de Paris. After earning his undergraduate degree in Sociology from PUC, he obtained a Master’s degree from Université Paris Descartes. Upon completing his PhD, he carried out postdoctoral research at CSI. He was a Visiting Fellow at the Centre for Invention and Social Process at Goldsmiths, University of London. He is an associate researcher at the Center for Sustainable Urban Development (CEDEUS). His research, creative work, and teaching focus on two main areas: the analysis of the sociotechnical impact of digital infrastructures and devices, and the anthropology of design, exploring non-anthropocentric approaches oriented towards planetary sustainability and more-than-human interdependencies. He is co-editor of Design for More-Than-Human Futures: Towards Post-Anthropocentric Worlding (with M. Chilet, C. Ureta Marín, and P. Hermansen; Routledge, 2023). Some of his most recent publications include 'Artificial Intelligence in the New Forms of Environmental Governance in the Chilean State: Towards an Eco-Algorithmic Governance' (co-authored with D. I. Rivera Lisboa; Technology in Society, vol. 74) and 'How to Become Terrestrial: Design for Planetary Habitability' (in How to Design a Revolution: The Chilean Road to Design, Lars Müller Publishers, 2024).

References

Adams, R. (2021). Can Artificial Intelligence Be Decolonized? Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 46(1-2), 176-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2020.1840225

Arias, D. (2024, January 22). Santiago de Chile en el futuro. Image generated with DALL·E [Originally posted on Instagram by @davidnoaah]. Publimetro Chile. https://miniurl.cl/ktkuv9

Arias, D. (2024, January 22). Inteligencia artificial predice cómo se verá Santiago en el futuro y el resultado es viral. Publimetro Chile. https://www.publimetro.cl/social/2024/01/22/inteligencia-artificial-predice-como-se-vera-santiago-en-el-futuro-y-el-resultado-es-viral/

Bareis, J., & Katzenbach, C. (2022). Talking AI into Being: The Narratives and Imaginaries of National AI Strategies and Their Performative Politics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 47(5), 855-881. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211030007

Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006). The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3-4), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002

Cave, S., & Dihal, K. S. (2019). Hopes and Fears for Intelligent Machines in Fiction and Reality. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(2), 74-78 https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0020-9

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2023). The Decolonial Turn in Data and Technology Research: What Is at Stake and Where Is It Heading? Information, Communication & Society, 26(4), 786-802. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1986102

Debaise, D., & Stengers, I. (2015). Gestes spéculatifs: Colloque de Cerisy. Les Presses du réel.

Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. MIT Press.

Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371816

Escobar, A. (2019). Habitability and Design: Radical Interdependence and the Re-Earthing of Cities. Geoforum, 101, 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.02.015

Giaccardi, E., & Redström, J. (2020). Technology and More-Than-Human Design. Design Issues, 36(4), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00612

Haraway, D. (2018). Staying With the Trouble for Multispecies Environmental Justice. Dialogues in Human Geography, 8(1), 102-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820617739208

Hudson, A. D., Finn, E., & Wylie, R. (2023). What Can Science Fiction Tell Us About the Future of Artificial Intelligence Policy? AI & Society, 38(1), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01273-2

Hui, Y. (2021). Art and Cosmotechnics. University of Minnesota Press.

Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2013). Sociotechnical Imaginaries and National Energy Policies. Science as Culture, 22(2), 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2013.786990

Katzenbach, C. (2021). “AI will fix this” – The Technical, Discursive, and Political Turn to AI in Governing Communication. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 20539517211046182. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211046182

Medina, E. (2006). Designing Freedom, Regulating a Nation: Socialist Cybernetics in Allende’s Chile. Journal of Latin American Studies, 38(3), 571-606. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X06001179

Michael, M. (2022). Ignorance and the Epistemic Choreography of Social Research. In M. Gross & L. McGoey (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies. Routledge.

Mohamed, S., Png, M.-T., & Isaac, W. (2020). Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence. Philosophy & Technology, 33(4), 659-684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00405-8

Natale, S., & Ballatore, A. (2020). Imagining the Thinking Machine: Technological Myths and the Rise of Artificial Intelligence. Convergence, 26(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517715164

Paltieli, G. (2022). The Political Imaginary of National AI Strategies. AI & Society, 37(4), 1613-1624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01258-1

Pasman, G. (2016). Design Fiction As a Service Design Approach. Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes.2016 Conference, 125, 511-515. https://ep.liu.se/konferensartikel.aspx?series=ecp&issue=125&Article_No=44

Quijano, A. (2000). Colonialidad del poder, eurocentrismo y América Latina. In E. Lander (Ed.), La colonialidad del saber: Eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales. (pp. 122-151). CLACSO.

Salo-Pöntinen, H., & Saariluoma, P. (2022). Reflections on the Human Role in AI Policy Formulations: How Do National AI Strategies View People? Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00019-3

Sartori, L., & Theodorou, A. (2022). A Sociotechnical Perspective for the Future of AI: Narratives, Inequalities, and Human Control. Ethics and Information Technology, 24(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09624-3

Stengers, I. (2005). The Cosmopolitical Proposal. In B. Latour & P. Weibel (Eds.), Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy (pp. 994-1003). MIT Press.

Stengers, I. (2017). In Catastrophic Times: Resisting the Coming Barbarism. Open Humanities Press.

Tironi, M., Chilet, M., Ureta Marín, C., & Hermansen, P. (Eds.). (2023). Design For More-Than-Human Futures Towards Post-Anthropocentric Worlding. Routledge.

Vernáez, G., Velásquez, L., & Carrero, C. (2019). Del SYNCO de Chile al SINCO de Venezuela. Sistema de integración y transferencia de poder al pueblo. In Maguitman, C. I. Chesñevar, & E. Estevez (Eds.), Soluciones de gobernanza electrónica para la participación ciudadana (pp. 136-153). Universidad Nacional del Sur.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.