Anti-oppressive Assessment Strategies for Design Teaching

Main Article Content

Renato Bernasconi


This editorial aims to contribute to the discussion opened by the editors of this special issue by making visible the power dynamics that are implicit in evaluation strategies. It is argued that, by uncritically evaluating students, we not only reproduce patterns of social stratification but also legiti­mize them. Three strategies are proposed that could contribute to the adoption of liberating forms of assessment in the field of design education: self-assess­ment, freedom of format, and free assessment weighting. Beyond their instru­mental value, it is emphasized that these strategies make power relations visible, opening a way to subvert them.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bernasconi, R. (2022). Anti-oppressive Assessment Strategies for Design Teaching. Diseña, (21), Editorial.


Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking Assessment for the Learning Society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167.

Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G. (2013). Does Student Engagement in Self-assessment Calibrate their Judgement over Time? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(8), 941–956.

Broadfoot, P. (1996). Education, Assessment, and Society: A Sociological Analysis. Open University Press.

Brown, W. (2011). Neoliberalized Knowledge. History of the Present, 1(1), 113–129.

Crabtree, S. A., Hemingway, A., Sudbury, S., Quinney, A., Hutchings, M., Esteves, L., Thompson, S., Jacey, H., Diaz, A., Bradley, P., Hall, J., Board, M., Feigenbaum, A., Brown, L., Heaslip, V., & Norton, L. (2020). Donning the ‘Slow Professor’: A Feminist Action Research Project. Radical Teacher, 116, 55–65.

Cummins, J. (2003). Challenging the Construction of Difference as Deficit: Where are Identity, Intellect, Imagination, and Power in the New Regime of Truth? In P. P. Trifonas (Ed.), Pedagogies of Difference: Rethinking Education for Social Change (pp. 39–57). Routledge.

Filer, A. (2000). Assessement: Social Practice and Social Product. Routledge.

Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books.

Freire, P. (1997). Pedagogía del oprimido. Siglo Veintiuno Editores.

Godwin, S. E., & Ward‐Edwards, C. (2018). Participatory Assessment: Enlisting Community Partners to Facilitate Boundary Spanning, Reflexive Student Activism, and Institutional Change. In D. E. Lund (Ed.), The Wiley International Handbook of Service-Learning for Social Justice (pp. 415–436). Wiley.

Hanesworth, P., Bracken, S., & Elkington, S. (2019). A Typology for a Social Justice Approach to Assessment: Learning from Universal Design and Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(1), 98–114.

Illich, I. (1973). Deschooling Society. Harrow.

King, C. J. (2018). Service‐Learning as Power Analysis in the Humanities. In D. E. Lund (Ed.), The Wiley International Handbook of Service-Learning for Social Justice (pp. 437–455). Wiley.

McArthur, J. (2016). Assessment for Social Justice: The Role of Assessment in Achieving Social Justice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), 967–981.

Quijano, A. (2014). Cuestiones y horizontes: De la dependencia histórico-estructural a la colonialidad/descolonialidad del poder. CLACSO.

Reitenauer, V. (2019). “A Practice of Freedom”: Self-grading for Liberatory Learning. Radical Teacher, 113, 103–105.

Ruggerone, L., & Stauss, R. (2022). The Deceptive Mirror: The Dressed Body Beyond Reflection. Fashion Theory, 26(2), 211–235.

Spademan, T. B. (1999). Radical Pedagogy and the Logic of Assessment. The Radical Teacher, 56, 26–29.

Taylor, A., Glick, S., & Peikazadi, N. (2018). Service‐Learning and the Discourse of Social Justice. In D. E. Lund (Ed.), The Wiley International Handbook of Service-Learning for Social Justice (pp. 29–51). Wiley.

Walker, M., & Nguyen, T. (2015). ‘Capabilities-friendly’ Assessment for Quality Learning. South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(4), 243–259.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>