Review Form
|
TITLE |
|
|
DATE |
|
|
ORIGINALITY AND IMPORTANCE |
|
|
-It makes a significant contribution to published literature.
|
⃝ Agree ⃝ Partially agree ⃝ Disagreement |
|
-Provides a sufficient amount of new knowledge and expands research on the subject.
|
⃝ Agree ⃝ Partially agree ⃝ Disagreement |
|
-Please include comments on the originality and importance of the manuscript. If you expressed disagreement with the preview statements, please base your opinion to help the author to correct the deficiencies of the work.
|
|
|
RELEVANCE |
|
|
-Fits the purpose of the magazine and the subject proposed in the call.
|
⃝ Agree ⃝ Partially agree ⃝ Disagreement |
|
-It will be useful for those who inquire into new project methodologies and applied research.
|
⃝ Agree ⃝ Partially agree ⃝ Disagreement |
|
APPROPRIATE COVERAGE OF EXISTING LITERATURE |
|
|
-It refers to relevant jobs, the coverage is up to date and does not omit relevant jobs.
|
⃝ Agree ⃝ Partially agree ⃝ Disagreement |
|
-Please indicate which papers or relevant authors should be reviewed by the author. |
|
|
QUALITY OF SCRIPTURE |
|
|
-It's well written, easy to read, and your language is not complicated.
|
⃝ Agree ⃝ Partially agree ⃝ Disagreement |
|
-Considers all the guidelines of the journal in relation to the structure and content of the article.
|
⃝ Agree ⃝ Partially agree ⃝ Disagreement |
|
- Follow the rules of the APA manual.
|
⃝ Agree ⃝ Partially agree ⃝ Disagreement |
|
ORGANIZATION |
|
|
-The abstract is a good synthesis of the manuscript (includes the topic, perspective, relevance, methodology and most relevant results) and is in Spanish. |
⃝ Agree ⃝ Partially agree ⃝ Disagreement |
|
-The introduction exposes a hypothesis or a purpose, offers a contextualization within the literature and a perspective to understand the work. |
⃝ Agree ⃝ Partially agree ⃝ Disagreement |
|
-The research design, sources and procedures are widely developed..
|
⃝ Agree ⃝ Partially agree ⃝ Disagreement |
|
-Examine and interpret the results correctly, analyze their implications and offer a broader framework to contextualize them.
|
⃝ Agree ⃝ Partially agree ⃝ Disagreement |
|
-Proposes the consequences of the research, highlights the importance of the findings and proposes new hypotheses and lines of research for the future. |
⃝ Agree ⃝ Partially agree ⃝ Disagreement |
|
QUALITY |
|
|
-Please mention the main strengths of the manuscript.
|
|
|
-Please mention the main weaknesses of the manuscript. |
|
RESOLUTION
In summary, and in agreement with the one expressed in the pattern of publication, indicate its resolution:
⃝ ACCEPTANCE WITHOUT REPAIRS (the manuscript is suitable for publication in its current form). Please reserve this alternative only for outstanding work.
⃝ ACCEPTANCE WITH MINOR CHANGES (the manuscript will be ready for publication after slight adjustments).
⃝ RETURN TO REVIEW AND CORRECTION (the manuscript would benefit from substantial changes, such as broadening data analysis, expanding literature review, or rewriting sections of the text).
⃝ REJECTION (the manuscript is not suitable for publication in Diseña).
|
In case of acceptance with minor changes, please list the revisions recommended to the author. In case of return for review and correction, please list the changes that the author must make before returning the manuscript for a second review.
|
Please, before sending your evaluation, check if the following requirements are available:
⃝ The criticisms are constructive (remember that the authors expect positive feedback on their part);
⃝ The recommendations for the editorial coordinator are clear;
⃝ Conflicts of interest are informed;
⃝ Comments are apt to be sent without modification to the author; ;
⃝ Vague or generalized assessments, as well as negative, irrelevant or destructive comments, are non-existent.