Editorial: Emancipatory Ways of Feeling (the Body as a Subversive Project)

Main Article Content

Renato Bernasconi

Abstract

This editorial intends to contribute to the ― open ― program of soma design by bringing up two moments of rupture in the dualistic concep­tion that opposes the mind to the body. First ― through the feminist reading of Moira Gatens ―, certain ideas formulated by Baruch Spinoza, implicit in soma design, are made explicit with emphasis on those referring to the radical open­ness of the body (to the interrelation with other bodies) and the capacities of the body as an object capable of expanding and actualizing its power. Secondly ― through Georges Vigarello ―, some postulates developed by Denis Diderot concerning the senses and embodied epistemology are highlighted, in partic­ular those that paved the way for us to understand how the modes of perception of the body affect the perception of ourselves and, therefore, our sense of iden­tity. These moments of rupture are linked to the emergence of an emancipatory ethics, committed to the plurality of bodies. Finally, a call is made to promote the rebellious impetus of the body through somatic methods that recognize the various oppressive and disciplined ways of feeling, as well as the power relations inscribed in the phenomenology of bodily experience.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bernasconi, R. (2022). Editorial: Emancipatory Ways of Feeling (the Body as a Subversive Project). Diseña, (20), Editorial. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.20.Editorial (Original work published January 31, 2022)
Section
Editorial

References

Butler, J. (2003). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. Routledge.

Butler, J. (2005). Giving an Account of Oneself. Fordham University Press.

Cash, C. (2015). Disentangling Embodied Cognition: An Examination of the State, Problems, and Possibilities of Embodied Cognition [Doctoral Disertation, University of Arkansas]. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1376

Corbin, A., Courtine, J.-J., & Vigarello, G. (2005). Prefacio. In G. Vigarello (Ed.), Historia del cuerpo: Vol. 1: Del Renacimiento al Siglo de las Luces (pp. 17–22). Taurus.

Crossley, N. (2006). Reflexive Embodiment in Contemporary Society. Open University Press.

Davies, O., & Riach, K. (2018). Sociomateriality and Qualitative Research: Method, Matter and Meaning. In C. Cassell, A. Cunliffe, & G. Grandy, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods: Methods and Challenges (pp. 133–149). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526430236.n9

Frank, A. W. (1990). Bringing Bodies Back in: A Decade Review. Theory, Culture & Society, 7(1), 131–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327690007001007

Gatens, M. (1995). Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality. Routledge.

Graves, B. (2014). The Corporeal Turn in Mathematical Thinking. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1358–1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.397

Grosz, E. (1989). Sexual Subversions: Three French Feminists. Allen & Unwin.

Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Indiana University Press.

Höök, K. (2018). Designing with the Body: Somaesthetic Interaction Design. MIT Press.

Höök, K., Eriksson, S., Louise Juul Søndergaard, M., Ciolfi Felice, M., Campo Woytuk, N., Kilic Afsar, O., Tsaknaki, V., & Ståhl, A. (2019). Soma Design and Politics of the Body. Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363385

Koeltzsch, G. K. (2021). The Body as site of Academic Consciousness. A Methodological Approach for Embodied (auto)Ethnography. Academia Letters, Article 2819. https://www.academia.edu/57426939/The_body_as_site_of_academic_consciousness_A_methodological_approach_for_embodied_auto_ethnography

Lloyd, H. M. (2013). Sensibilité, Embodied Epistemology, and the French Enlightenment. In H. M. Lloyd (Ed.), The Discourse of Sensibility: The Knowing Body in the Enlightenment (pp. 171–193). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02702-9_9

Marenko, B. (2010). Contagious Affectivity. The Management of Emotions in Late Capitalist Design. 134–149. http://sdn2010.ch/images/Conference%20Book%20Swiss%20Design%20Network%20Conference%202010.pdf

Porter, R. (2001). History of the Body Reconsidered. In P. Burke (Ed.), New Perspectives on Historical Writing, 2nd Edition. The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Porter, R. (2003). Historia del cuerpo. In P. Burke (Ed.), Formas de hacer historia (pp. 255–286). Alianza.

Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2011). The Corporeal Turn. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(7–8), 145–168.

Shusterman, R. (1997). Somaesthetics and the Body/Media Issue. Body & Society, 3(3), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X97003003002

Varela, F. (2000). El Fenómeno de la vida. Dolmen.

Vigarello, G. (2017). El sentimiento de sí: Historia de la percepción del cuerpo (S. XVI-S. XX). Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

Vila, A. C. (2013). Penseurs Profonds: Sensibility and the Knowledge-Seeker in Eighteenth-Century France. In H. M. Lloyd (Ed.), The Discourse of Sensibility: The Knowing Body in the Enlightenment (pp. 125–145). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02702-9_7

Willett, C. (2019). Three Questions for Moira Gatens and Spinoza. Philosophy Today, 63(3), 773–780. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday2019633286

Witz, A. (2000). Whose Body Matters? Feminist Sociology and the Corporeal Turn in Sociology and Feminism. Body & Society, 6(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X00006002001

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2